Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Wilson have the leading judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson agree. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:47 pm
(Orin Kerr) The opinion is Macdonald v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 8:08 pm
Orin Kerr had one at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
United States to avoid the recusal problems raised by DOJ’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
Lord Kerr’s answer to both questions was a firm no. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
(Orin Kerr) The case is Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
Some might think that, given that we had unanimity in Kinloch (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 62, the diversity of opinions in the JR38 judgement is a bit surprising. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:24 am
Bush and Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) A recent decision of the District of New Mexico, United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
See,e .g., United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
In line with his earlier judgment in Hesham Ali (case comment here), Lord Reed rejected the Secretary of State’s submissions that in cases of non-settled migrants, the question is whether the state owed them a positive obligation to grant leave to remain, rather than whether there had been an interference with art 8 which could be justified. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:06 am
Jones–A Case Of Sound And Fury Herding Katz: GPS Tracking And Society's Expectations Of Privacy In The 21st Century United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Black consider that the duty to act fairly in the circumstances involves a “duty not to deprive, not an obligation to create”. [read post]
