Search for: "Khan v Khan" Results 381 - 400 of 830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 7:51 am by Administrator
Khan at paras. 69 and 73. [read post]
About the author: Asad Ali Khan is BA, MSc, MA, LLB (Hons), BVC, LLM, Barrister-at-Law (Middle Temple), Advocate High Courts Pakistan. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm by Josh Wright
The Statement states that “Congress passed the FTC Act to push back against the judiciary’s open-ended rule of reason for analyzing Sherman Act claims” and cites the Supreme Court’s opinion in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ali Khan, The Qur'an and the Constitution, 85 Tulane Law Review 161-190 (2010). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Current FTC Chair Lina Khan has not shied away from sharing her view that noncompetes are inherently anticompetitive and should be prohibited altogether. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Varun Nambiar
Sharif was found guilty under section 9(a)(v) of Pakistan’s National Accountability Ordinance. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Cases of Misdiagnosis Highlight the Importance of Getting a Second Opinion – Philadelphia attorney Stuart Carpey of Kreithen Baron & Carpey on his blog, Pennsylvania Injury Law Report Alabama’s Wrongful Death Laws Protect All Life (Is the Alabama Supreme Court on a Collision Course with Federal Abortion Law) – Huntsville, Alabama attorney Jeff Blackwell on his firm’s blog, Alabama Litigation Review Click-Accept Arbitration: Enforcing Arbitration Provisions in Online Terms… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Twenty Year Anniversary of Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms Khan and her son, the second defendant, who had not participated, found jointly liable for costs, where only Ms Khan had legal aid costs protection. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
And if any bias was established it would simply go to the weight given to the testimony (see Khan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In Meadows v Khan and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton, the Supreme Court set out a six-part test for determining a damages claim for the tort of negligence. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 20; and the precedent has "been questioned by Members of th[is] Court in later decisions, and [has] defied consistent application by the lower courts," Payne v. [read post]