Search for: "Khan v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
In particular, a scheme whereby a prisoner was compelled to pay half the money received from his family to the State was held to fall within the wide margin of appreciation afforded to states under A1P1 (Laduna v Slovakia, ECtHR, judgment of 13 December 2011) [46]. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Khan stated that “Kids must be able to play and learn online without being endlessly tracked by companies looking to hoard and monetize their personal data. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
Khan were being held at Gitmo, if Pakistan would simply release him, and if all we had on him were a stated intent to proliferate nukes in the future, he would be the one prisoner who falls into this netherworld. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the harassment case of Khan (formerly JMO) v Khan (formerly KTA) [2018] EWHC 241 (QB)). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
  In her article, Khan criticized the administration at the time for its handling of concentration in the industry after it engaged in multiple agricultural hearings in 2010 to expose problematic issues: The other factor the administration blames is the weakened state of America’s antitrust laws. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]