Search for: "Kind v. Clark"
Results 381 - 400
of 489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Choi discussed two cases (Styles v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Wording of that kind would not prevent references to appearances or activities in public or social circumstances. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
Penry v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:53 am
Newman wrote in LoDuca v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:00 am
A special five judge Court of Appeal panel upheld his conviction (R v Rowe [2007] EWCA Crim 635). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
A police car is not the kind of public place, like a phone booth (e.g., Katz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
Tropicana Las VegasLast year, I wrote about the Nevada lawsuit involving a dispute about use of the name Tropicana in connection with the famed Tropicana Resort & Casino in Las Vegas (link here). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Most recently, HCL has built two kinds of solutions--one more prevalent across the board, and the other more unique--in case of food contamination. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
Personally I think indebtedness should be adjusted based on CoL factors, and I think $100K is kind of a random number picked more for its roundness than its relation to any solid economic factor. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
No defense possible, which explains why this kind of sanction is called the "civil death penalty. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
Clark, 111 U.s. 120 (1884)). [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
G v E and others [2010] EWCA Civ 822 – Read judgment This post was written with the kind help of Jaime Lindsey The Court of Appeal has held that a person who lacks mental capacity can be detained if the Court of Protection considers that it is in their best interests, without having to meet additional conditions under Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm
I was reminded of all this by Francis Pileggi's post on a recent Delaware case, Hampshire Group, Limited v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
It must be similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the offense charged; 3. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
A (Appellant) v Essex County Council & National Autistic Society (Intervener) [2010] UKSC 33 Supreme Court (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke) July 14 2010 The right to education under Article 2 Protocol 1 of the Convention was not breached by the delay in catering for the special educational needs of a child. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
Although the "doctrinal foundations" of the cited cases, which generally arose under the Equal Protection Clause, e.g., Clarke v. [read post]
