Search for: "LJ"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
On 20 June 2019 the Court of Appeal (Males LJ) granted Bloomberg LP permission to appeal in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
(Mummery LJ, [31]). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
In the Court of Appeal, Bean LJ (giving the leading judgment) noted that his pension was far more advantageous than it would be if he had not become permanently incapacitated from his job (since in that situation he would lose his entitlement to any pension until his normal retirement age of 67). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
There was a news item about the case on the 5RB website On the same day Haddon-Cave LJ refused permission to appeal in the case of Burgon v NGN. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 00170-19 Salih v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach – after investigation 07959-18 UWE Bristol v Bristol Post, 1 Accuracy (2018), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 02852-19 Cook v Stamford Mercury, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 00457-18 Tabor-Thickett… [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
" – Lewison LJ, in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 [143]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
”Officious bystander says "No"Jacob LJ, on appeal, in the Griggs case, considered an alternative to the assignment, namely a limited licence. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If the defendant "knew the risk and decided it was best not to remove it" then that is a factor in favor of maintaining the status quo and granting an injunction (see Aldous LJ in SmithKline Beecham v Apotex [2003] FSR 31 at [40]; see also Arnold J in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 at [133]). [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Thus, the test of compulsion remained unaltered and Irwin LJ held: 74. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
The Press Gazette reports that the Divisional Court (Sharp LJ and Warby J) has given permission for a new contempt of court case to be brought against Mr Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson) . [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:50 am
Patten LJ concluded that Mr Jimenez’s “identifiable relationship with the UK”, by virtue of being a person who is or may be liable for tax in the UK meant that the “sufficient connection” test was satisfied. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:47 pm
GB v Home Office is an early example, in which Coulson J referred to the requirement for consistency that had been highlighted by Moore-Bick LJ in JXMX. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
The short Easter legal term began on Tuesday 30 April 2019 and ends 4½ weeks later on 24 May 2019. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 pm
The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Court of Appeal On the basis that the case raised important issues regarding “outstanding benefit” and how this benefit should be calculated, a second appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal, [2017] EWCA Civ 2, before Patten LJ, Briggs LJ, and Sales LJ. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:54 am
The discussion will take place in Room LJ-119, located on the first floor of the Thomas Jefferson Building, 10 First Street S.E., Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
On appeal, with Mr F in person and Mr E represented by Shelter Cymru, HHJ Jarman QC looked to a decision of Jackson LJ in Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust v Atos IT Services UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 2196, at 37 The other word to which the judge attaches significance is “or” at the end of paragraph 9.2.1. [read post]
