Search for: "Layman" Results 381 - 400 of 1,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 1:50 pm
In layman's terms, constructive possession means the illegal item(s) is in a place where it is sufficiently clear the suspect knew it was there and had some control over it. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:36 pm
According to a Westchester County Probate Lawyer, a will drawn by a layman must be construed with that fact in mind. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:38 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said defendant was indicted for multiple counts of handgun possession and a single count of possession of weapons with intent to sell, the defendant, waived a jury and the case was tried by the court. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:38 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said defendant was indicted for multiple counts of handgun possession and a single count of possession of weapons with intent to sell, the defendant, waived a jury and the case was tried by the court. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:55 am by Geoffrey
As a layman, I wondered why lawyers thought the matter in need of study when nothing seemed simpler than for two parties in conflict to say, to a friend, “We have a problem. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 11:41 am by Duets Guest Blogger
This is a decision that every trademark attorney knows, but one that’s likely to puzzle a layman. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:40 pm
A particular question which a layman frequently asked us is “how can I be charged with DWI if there is no breathalyzer or intoxilizer that indicates how much alcohol I had in my system? [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:40 pm
A particular question which a layman frequently asked us is “how can I be charged with DWI if there is no breathalyzer or intoxilizer that indicates how much alcohol I had in my system? [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A particular question which a layman frequently asked us is “how can I be charged with DWI if there is no breathalyzer or intoxilizer that indicates how much alcohol I had in my system? [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A particular question which a layman frequently asked us is “how can I be charged with DWI if there is no breathalyzer or intoxilizer that indicates how much alcohol I had in my system? [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:23 am by John McFarland
There are actually two draft articles, one explaining the issue in layman’s terms and a second providing a more scholarly legal analysis with citations. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm
  InFuse is a prescription only medical device and therefore, the FDCA recognizes that its directions for use won’t adequately inform a layman how to use the device safely. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm
Layman” is a classic example — when you’re talking about religious matters, a layman is someone who isn’t clergy; when you’re talking about medicine, a layman is someone who isn’t a doctor; when you’re talking about law, a layman is someone who isn’t a lawyer. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:11 pm by Bill Otis
As it exists right now, the bill's central operative provision says this:Notwithstanding any provision of law other than this subsection, the court may impose a sentence below a statutory minimum if the court finds that it is necessary to do so in order to avoid violating the requirements of subsection (a).A layman reading that language would have at best a hazy idea, and probably none at all, about specifically what crimes would be included in the new, vastly expanded degree of… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
In layman’s terms, this decision means that an attorney sued for malpractice can argue that his/her former client would have been unable to collect any money awarded in a verdict. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
In layman’s terms, this decision means that an attorney sued for malpractice can argue that his/her former client would have been unable to collect any money awarded in a verdict. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:25 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
In layman’s terms, this decision means that an attorney sued for malpractice can argue that his/her former client would have been unable to collect any money awarded in a verdict. [read post]