Search for: "Leah Litman"
Results 381 - 400
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Leah Litman recap some of last week’s arguments and look ahead to Thursday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:55 pm
” Online at The Los Angeles Times, law professor Leah Litman has an essay titled “The Supreme Court’s census ruling is a victory for truth and the rule of the law. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Leah Litman points out some areas of overlap between the government’s position in Jennings v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:34 pm
Here is the rundown (in chronological order) with links to the reviews and the underlying papers: Mila Sohoni, Form And Substance In The New Major Questions Doctrine, JOTWELL (January 12, 2023) (reviewing Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Virginia L. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman weighs in on the rulings, suggesting that although “[t]he Court has made it a habit of penalizing and calling out prisoners for their death penalty litigation tactics,” “[i]n fact, it is the states’ sloppiness and secrecy that is creating many of the problems. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:25 am
The retaliation he could exact could be disastrous for a new grad and, as confirmed by Michigan prawf Leah Litman who was one of the people who accused Koz, Reinhardt was not above retaliation. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman maintains that “it doesn’t really matter whether the President issued the clarifying memorandum in response to the injunctions or possibility of mootness,” and that the “key point—and the problem for the administration—is that the entry procedures are not now, and perhaps were never formally linked to the government’s review of its entry procedures. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman asserts that last week’s two stay orders, in June Medical Services and Dunn v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:03 am
Leah Litman (Michigan 2010 / Sutton) 3. ? [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
” In a episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Leah Litman and Kate Shaw “break down the major arguments in the presidential immunity and subpoena cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:04 am
” Additional commentary comes from Elie Mystal at The Nation and Leah Litman at The Atlantic. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:38 am
In a Strict Scrutiny podcast, Kate Shaw and Leah Litman recap the faithless elector cases and “discuss some findings about the Court’s telephonic arguments and the BIG (aka not so big) opinions the Court has recently released. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
” Leah Litman, writing for Slate, interprets Roberts’ jurisprudence this term as rejecting attempts by conservative litigators and conservative lower courts to change the law too quickly. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
This blog’s opinion analysis comes from Leah Litman. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
” Additional commentary on the guidelines comes from Adam Cox and Ryan Goodman at Just Security, Leah Litman at Take Care, and Marty Lederman at Just Security here and here. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” At Take Care, Leah Litman “look[s] at the current Supreme Court term through the lens of #MeToo,” noting that some of this term’s cases “reveal how legal institutions can contribute to some of the mechanisms that both enable harassment and undermine our ability to address it. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Leah Litman discusses the case at the Columbia Law Review’s Sidebar, while at ISCOTUSnow Edward Lee predicts the winner of the oral argument based on the number of questions for each side. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:17 am
” In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Leah Litman and Ian Samuel talk to Rick Hasen about his book, “The Justice of Contradictions: Antonin Scalia and the Politics of Disruption. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am
” At Take Care, Steve Vladeck and Leah Litman maintain that two developments on Wednesday in the entry-ban cases “de-couple the entry ban from the internal review procedures—and, in doing so, undermine (perhaps fatally) the government’s strongest arguments for the ban itself. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post (subscription required), Leah Litman observes that “[t]he Supreme Court gave the Trump administration a gift Tuesday — one that could greatly help the president in the 2020 election[:] In an order that received less attention than it deserved, the court declined to speed up its consideration of a challenge to the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
