Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers" Results 381 - 400 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:41 am
The English High Court, in Clare Horwood & Others v Land of Leather (In Administration) & Zurich Insurance PLC & Others [2010] EWHC 546 (Comm), held that Zurich did not have to pay compensation to customers who suffered burns from "toxic sofas" sold by the now-defunct Land of Leather. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:41 am
The English High Court, in Clare Horwood & Others v Land of Leather (In Administration) & Zurich Insurance PLC & Others [2010] EWHC 546 (Comm), held that Zurich did not have to pay compensation to customers who suffered burns from "toxic sofas" sold by the now-defunct Land of Leather. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am by M Bates
See, OHS legislation doesn't apply to the farm, so, if he chooses to wear safety glasses, leather gloves, a welding apron, or perhaps even coveralls...he may well be subjecting his person and his vehicles to warrantless search. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority & Anor… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Dismissal of disciplinary charges recommended where correction officers were unable to anticipate the need for, or degree of, force requiredCorrection v Dominguz and Edward Martinez, OATH #550/10; 551/10OATH Administrative Law Judge Alessandra Zorgniotti recommended dismissal of charges brought against two New York City Department of Corrections correction officers alleging violations of various provisions of the Department's use of force directive.Where, as here, said Judge… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm by lawmrh
See DCCA Opinion No. 07-CV-872: Pearson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm
The AmeriKat previously reported about the ping-pong Nokia v Apple patent litigation (here and here). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:58 am by MikeW
Communes i. v. conclusiones, ad generalem quorum cunque statutorum interpretationem acommodatae. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:08 pm
Litigation and transactional is like Sharks v. [read post]