Search for: "Lee v. United States Government" Results 381 - 400 of 1,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2009, 10:27 am
United States:   To be "necessary and proper" the means must be more than rationally related to the end, they must  be "plainly adapted" to that end. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am by Joseph Fishkin
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Beth Van Schaack
  The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm by Mike
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston lays out the timeline and procedures by which the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry into the United States of foreign nationals from six majority-Muslim countries could make its way before the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]