Search for: "Leonard v. Leonard"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
In a decision unsealed on May 3, 2013, Judge Leonard P. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
Judge Leonard P. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Orion IP, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm
Parallel Networks v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:04 am
Leonard volunteered to sit in on yesterday's status hearing in the USA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:19 am
However, in one case Akorita v Marina Heights (St Leonards) Ltd [2011] UKUT 255 (LC), the Upper Tribunal did make a comment about the correct approach to s.20C, LTA 1985, that I do think is worth bringing to your attention. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 11:15 am
Australian cricket captain Ricky Ponting has lodged an application (set for hearing in the Federal Court on 8 February 2008) claiming misleading and deceptive conduct against the operator of a website which described itself as "the official Ricky Ponting site": Ricky Thomas Ponting v Kevin Leonard Consulting Pty Limited (ACN 087 382 858) & Anor (also see Computerworld story) It is not clear why Ricky Ponting has chosen litigation rather than the domain name… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:36 pm
Southwire Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:19 am
However, in one case Akorita v Marina Heights (St Leonards) Ltd [2011] UKUT 255 (LC), the Upper Tribunal did make a comment about the correct approach to s.20C, LTA 1985, that I do think is worth bringing to your attention. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Stark in Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 12:27 pm
Stark in Cosmo Technologies Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Leonard and J. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 10:52 am
By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Leonard P. [read post]
7 May 2016, 12:16 pm
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm
Stark in UCB, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:47 am
Brady Reconstructed: An Overdue Expansion of Rights and Remedies Leonard Sosnov Widener University – School of Law 2014 New Mexico Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2014 Abstract: Over fifty years ago, the Supreme Court held in Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), that the Due Process Clause requires prosecutors to disclose materially favorable evidence to the defense. [read post]
7 May 2016, 12:16 pm
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court has agreed to review Frank v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. [read post]