Search for: "Lester v. Lester" Results 381 - 400 of 463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 14 June 2023 there was a hearing in the case of WFZ v BBC before Collins Rice J. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
The cross-party amendments to the Defamation Bill in the House of Lords have drawn the ire of Lord Lester and libel reform campaigners. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Lord Fowler criticised the government’s plans for a media regulator backed by Royal Charter, while Lord Lester was concerned about Lord Justice Leveson’s suggestion to extend the law on exemplary damages by Act of Parliament. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
Lester Nichols and Ray Lunsford were registered sex offenders from the Kansas City area. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  Meanwhile, the Press Gazette reported a bizarre attack on the Royal Charter by Lord Lester who apparently regarded it as outrageous because some people that he talks to have confused it with the Star Chamber. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
A Political Autobiography; Lester Julius’ Look Out Whitey, Black Power’s Gon Get Your Mama; Bobby Seale, Seize the Time: The Story of the Black Panther Party and Huey P. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
After the general election in July 2010, Lord Lester of Herne Hill tabled his private member’s bill which was adopted by the government to become the draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
  However, she links this to Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill (which would have no impact whatever on cases of this kind). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
 As was pointed out in the Parliamentary debates on the Data Protection Bill (particuarly by Lord Lester, Hansard, HL, 24 Mar 1998), the test of “necessity” in Article 9 is ignored by section 32. [read post]