Search for: "Liability and Insurers for Each Defendant, Defendant's"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 9:35 am
Representatives of the estates of each pursued insurance coverage for negligence of the driver/owner of the truck. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:47 pm
Then, the jury will be asked to assign a percentage of fault to each party, including the plaintiff. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:32 am
The insured had separately purchased excess liability coverage for several of the underlying policy periods.By 2004, the insured had been named as a defendant in more than 24,000 lawsuits, each alleging bodily injury from exposure to the insured’s products. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Congress encouraged the creation of RRGs with the Product Liability Risk Retention Act of 1981 in order to “reduce the problem of the rising cost of product liability insurance by permitting product manufacturers to purchase insurance on a group basis at more favorable rates or to self-insure through insurance cooperatives called risk retention groups. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:33 am
The first is that directors ought to be able to defend themselves, and so there should be no prohibition for the insurance providing defense expense protection. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Syllabus (summary) A wayward Chevy struck a tree Whose owner sued defendants three. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 9:31 am
An expert witness can help you establish liability, or show that a defendant’s lack of appropriate conduct was the cause of the injuries that you sustained. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 5:52 am
The defendant appealed on the basis that the statute that prohibits insurers from delaying settlement of claims does not allow recovery for each alleged act or omission and that the statute does not allow for an award of multiple damages and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
The coverage also depends on the specific wordings of each separate policy as the D&O insurance policies are each separately negotiated and each involves its own particular wording. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:00 pm
Even meritless claims that are dismissed long before trial can still be very costly to defend. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm
However, because each insurance policy is an agreement between the parties, it must be interpreted in accordance with the language of that policy. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 2:50 pm
As I noted in the opening paragraph above, there at least three sets of potential defendants, each one of which would look to a separate insurance program (or “Tower” of insurance): the SPAC; the private company (the “Target); and the merged company (the “Newco”); and/or their directors and officers could each be named. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 1:16 am
The defendant insurer’s liability was excluded for the operation of the vehicle when engaged in and undertaking its designed purpose, namely the designed purpose of performing the nominated activities and “like operations”. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:36 am
Defendants in car accident lawsuits aren’t always other drivers and their insurance companies. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:26 pm
The D&O insurer denied that it had any duty to defend or indemnify the Verbeeks. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am
Meanwhile, the insurer had filed a declaratory judgment action, seeking a declaration that the insured’s liability was not covered under the policy. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am
Meanwhile, the insurer had filed a declaratory judgment action, seeking a declaration that the insured’s liability was not covered under the policy. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm
Co.,139 F.3d 561 (7th Cir.1998) (holding, under Maryland law, liability insurer had duty to defend Roman Catholic Diocese against allegations of parents that former priest abused their children, the court finding that the plaintiff’s alleged injuries were a kind of accidental occurrence); Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:17 am
Same as with vicarious liability claims, legitimate negligent entrustment claims are a strategic boon of sorts in that they enable you — the injured plaintiff — to “spread liability” across multiple parties, particularly those who may have the insurance coverage or personal assets necessary to adequately cover your damages. [read post]
