Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 381 - 400 of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
Numerous readers have inquired what the Mississippi State Bar may be doing in relation to the Scruggs allegations. [read post]
Many hospitality businesses, such as restaurants and bars, have found themselves restructuring their daily operations in light of the current global COVID-19 health crisis, and the subsequent federal, state, and local shelter in place orders. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
New Relists City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:04 pm by Victor Rivera Jr.
  Indeed, the Second Circuit argued that plaintiff herself was seeking favoritism in light of her request to be freed from a restriction that applied to every member of the New York State Bar wishing to practice law in the State. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:04 pm by Victor Rivera Jr.
  Indeed, the Second Circuit argued that plaintiff herself was seeking favoritism in light of her request to be freed from a restriction that applied to every member of the New York State Bar wishing to practice law in the State. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:16 am by Sheppard Mullin
In light of this ruling, employers can be more confident that their arbitration agreements, if sufficiently broad, will bar Title VII class actions, including pattern-or-practice claims brought by employees under Title VII. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
  Though I suspect that the history that led up to the adoption of that Constitutional provision -- e.g., our experience with the British -- will shed a fair amount of light on why we don't want the government to have substantial leeway to conduct warrantless searches of people (and their property) that government officers merely suspect are treasonous or enemies of the state. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 9:30 am
Because we do not impose sanctions, referral to the State Bar is not mandatory. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:09 am by Phil
Inducement to Infringe - In light of the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Global-Tech v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:02 am
The defendants claimed that they were entitled to statutory immunity for the state law claims but the court rejected that as a basis for summary judgment because on the facts taken in the light most favorable to Sykes there was evidence sufficient for a jury to find actual malice, which would preclude qualified immunity. [read post]