Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 381 - 400 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  So, in opposing a stay, the state argued that “for a closely held corporation like [petitioner] Champion the Act operates as no more than a disclosure law of the sort this Court has long upheld. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am by Audrey A Millemann
The long-awaited decision by the United States Supreme Court on business method patents was issued on June 19, 2014. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce Lawyer said the Long Island SPCC was incorporated as a non-profit corporation under NPCL § 1403. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice, announced a new policy, in the form of an addition to the United States Attorneys’ Manual (“USAM”), concerning the coordination of corporate resolution penalties in cases involving penalties imposed by more than one regulator or law enforcement authority. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
The recent findings of an international trial monitoring panel in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
  (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
. ****************************** The United States Supreme Court held in Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
United States, the Court unanimously affirmed that a tipper’s gift of inside information can satisfy the “personal benefit” requirement of Dirks v. [read post]