Search for: "Long v. Hooks"
Results 381 - 400
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2007, 5:36 am
The Agency managed to wriggle off the hook by more or less repudiating its own authority. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
This Court has made plan that the role of the judiciary in interpreting an agency regulation is to follow the interpretation of the agency so long as it is not ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent’ with the regulation” (citing Auer v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
That’s the Bausch hook. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
Among the new opinions released on Thursday, August 25, 2011 was State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
The decision is long and detailed, and goes into the multiple failings of the American Transit to evaluate the case prior to trial and its attempts to shift blame to its attorney. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:07 am
Villalpando v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:19 pm
Bridgeport v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:28 am
More on Porter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
The Court made clear that multiple entities could be on the hook for a wage violation as long as each qualified as an employer under the test. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:02 am
 The new case is Staub v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
See Pye v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:09 pm
The Court made clear that multiple entities could be on the hook for a wage violation as long as each qualified as an employer under the test. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:05 pm
Todd v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
And you wonder why it takes victims so long? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:36 pm
In Level 3 Communications, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In our previous post on Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
(David Post) As I’ve noted before on a number of occasions, a possible landmark copyright case is now before the 2d Circuit, Viacom et al. v. [read post]
