Search for: "Long v. Perry" Results 381 - 400 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
A classic example of the lesser standard is Rice v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 2:51 pm by Barry Barnett
A Los Angeles police lieutenant (Perry Lopez) steps onto the pavement. [read post]
5 May 2013, 2:51 pm by Barry Barnett
A Los Angeles police lieutenant (Perry Lopez) steps onto the pavement. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“I stopped eating ground beef a long, long time ago because of my years in the processing plants…..that should tell you everything……” wrote one inspector in an email to a friend at the New York Department of Agriculture. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Long neglected in practice and academic scholarship, design patents have exploded in importance as a result both of recent changes in the law and high-profile cases like Apple v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
  It is Megan Benson, Railroads, Water Rights and the Long Reach of Houston and Texas Central Railroad Company v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
Perry, as well as additional commentary on last week’s oral arguments in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Yesterday evening, the Obama administration filed its long-awaited amicus brief in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
   The three sentence per curiam order (joined by Justices Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Labarga, and Perry) merely stated that the Third District’s decision in Dishkin was in “express and direct conflict” with its decision last year in Sosa v. [read post]