Search for: "Long v. Williams" Results 381 - 400 of 4,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), builds on this principle: "Offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection," id. at 297 (citing Giboney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
A defendant charged with a felony is certainly entitled to an indictment, but the right may be waived so long as the case is noncapital and the defendant is represented by counsel. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:38 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The dispute related to long leases of residential flats in a block in Southsea, Hampshire. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
Long before Section 404 arrived on the scene, there was already Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, which was enacted by Congress in 1977. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”However, to give the Third Amendment its due, we need to acknowledge that it did appear in the list of amendments that former Supreme Court Justice William Douglas used in Griswold v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 8:04 am by Josh Blackman
Here is the intro: Months before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
  Stephen Elkins has long pointed out that functioning constitutional regimes consist of a set of values and ends, institutions designed to achieve those values and ends, and a people who share those ends and can operate the institutions in ways that achieve those ends. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
It seems like he's been in prison since then on these charges, and the appeals have taken this long already. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]