Search for: "Los Angeles Times v. County of Los Angeles"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:02 pm
City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:45 pm
Attorney’s Office in downtown Los Angeles. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
Unlike County of Inyo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:52 pm
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Panel - Critical Perspectives on Reproductive Health Exceptionalism Moderator: Melissa Alexander, University of Wyoming College of Law Brietta Clark, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, Abortion Exceptionalism and NIFLA Linda Fentiman, Pace University School of Law, Of Mosquitoes and 'Moral Convictions': How Rolling Back the Affordable Care Act's Contraceptive Mandate Jeopardizes Women's and Children's Health Jennifer Oliva, West Virginia University, Gillespie… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:30 am
County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 517-18.) [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
One group is from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, whose members will certainly find the argument engaging. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
The authors of the 2016 Brookings study might have included some of these cases, had they been aware of them at the time. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" & date( reveals that in the 1800s the Abridgment was cited by this Court 38 times, and over 950 times by all the cases in the ALLCASES-OLD database. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,” “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:02 pm
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
David Savage reports for the Los Angeles Times that the justices also “let stand a $4-million verdict against two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies who were searching for a fugitive and mistakenly shot an innocent homeless couple sleeping in a shed,” “a rare victory for victims of mistaken police shootings. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:54 pm
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:50 pm
As Judge Orrick notes, a similar decision striking down the two new conditions was recently issued by the District court for the Central District of California, in a case brought by the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
