Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 1:55 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
BC653419 (Los Angeles Superior Court), the plaintiff alleged that the restaurant would schedule employees for “on-call” shifts, where the employee is expected to call the manager at a specific time or two hours prior to his or her scheduled start time. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:07 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:50 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He filed suit in the Southern District of New York, but the trial case granted defendant's motion to transfer the case to state court in California pursuant to a forum selection clause that plaintiff signed, stating that any dispute arising from the employment relationship must be venued in the Superior Court in Los Angeles. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:35 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
The plaintiff filed their putative class action in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging that the defendants routinely violated California labor laws relating to the employment of their servers, waiters, and waitresses at restaurants in California. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
In addition to the Cayman litigation, actions involving David (or David’s company, Thunder Studios), Price, and the Kazals pend in the Central District of California, the Superior Court of Los Angeles, and the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:51 pm by John G. Papianou
Westlake Properties, LLC,[ii] the plaintiff filed a FACTA class action in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]