Search for: "M BOOKER"
Results 381 - 400
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Booker. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
I’m not really a reviewer of fiction, and we’re reading for pleasure, but I’ll share some brief notes. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Garcia, Nicholas Eastern District of Michigan at Bay CityALICE M. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:17 pm
I'm very pleased to announce that Deven Desai will be joining Concurring Opinions as a permablogger. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
So I'm not going to criticize Team Libby for adding more firepower to help Libby. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:12 am
And, that's why I'm so mad. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:51 pm
Even the most Puritan of communities (I'm looking at you, New Haven!) [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:06 am
District Judge Ricardo M. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:16 am
The latest book I've read that brings up this appalling history is one I'm currently in the midst of. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:20 pm
And, of course, I'm already on the record as being in favor of a broader community role for the jury. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:10 am
Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in two cases dealing with the "reasonableness" standard of appellate review of sentencing decisions in the post-Booker era.
School LawTuesday, March 6, 2007By Jerome H. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 2:13 pm
NMCCA 200600836 (N-M. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 3:23 pm
Some related posts: Big Blakely retroactivity doings from Alaska Colorado Supreme Court says Blakely not retroactive Distinguishing finality interests between convictions and sentences What wrong with equitable Booker retroactivity in the Ninth Circuit? [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
SpiroEdward M. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:13 pm
I'm pretty pleased with it. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
Supreme Court itself did in Booker. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
The California Supreme Court tried to salvage its system, however, by analogizing it to federal sentencing under the post-Booker "advisory" Guidelines. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Since I practice primarily in federal court, I'm going to be more interested in a case argued next month: Next month in Rita v. [read post]
