Search for: "MARTINEZ v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
It asks questions around mere accessibility as a threshold for jurisdiction (as found in Pez Hejduk) and the eDate/Martinez ‘centre of interests’ criterion for recovery in respect of the entire harm suffered throughout the EU. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
Since an action for rectification and removal is indivisible it cannot be brought in each Member State in which the information is or was accessible.] [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Julie Rikelman
In other cases, such as Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These principles apply to allegations of legal malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]; Snyder v Brown Chiari, LLP, 116 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014]; Alaimo v McGeorge, 69 AD3d 1032, 1034 [2010]). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These factual allegations, as supplemented by plaintiffs’ papers in opposition to defendant attorney’s dismissal motion, sufficiently alleged a legal malpractice claim (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]; Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]