Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 381 - 400 of 19,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 9:04 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
Pape’s perspective on how he prepares for advocacy in the Court of Appeal will surely be of help to me when appearing in appellate court, or any court for that matter. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:34 pm by Joel A. Webber
This Matters to Your Business Patrick McKenna’s competitive diagnosis: “One of the major problems is that law firms and lawyers DO NOT UNDERSTAND the intricacies of industries. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:41 pm
Union of India got rekindled after the J&K Government's controversial decision not to seek the Supreme Court's opinion whether it could hand over the forest land to the Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board for non-forest purposes. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In decision J 16/96 the Board did not have to consider the question of whether LPs could be members of an association pursuant to R 101(9) because all the members of the association under consideration were professional representatives.[2.7] Decision J 16/96 [2] expressed the opinion that the DecInt was not binding on the Boards but that it was to be taken into account when interpreting R 101(9) EPC 1973. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
… that is the question.This is an appeal against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) to refuse the applicant’s request for a replacement of drawings under R 56(3). [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:17 am by WSLL
Did the court err as a matter of law when it declared that:a. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 7:25 am by Howard Friedman
A high-profile dispute between the Catholic Archdiocese of Peoria, Illinois and New York's Archbishop Cardinal Timothy Dolan over the body of Archbishop Fulton J. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:15 am by Benjamin Wittes
Yet contemplating the Washington Post’s revelation that the Department of Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis (DHS I&A) issued two intelligence reports about tweets I had written, I can’t help but think that this is what J. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
J., concurred as to Parts I (background) and II (subject matter jurisdiction) and in which SUTTON, J., concurred in the judgment. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:31 am by Legal Talk Network
Halbrook, senior fellow at the Independent Institute, to discuss the Supreme Court's ruling in this matter and the potential impact this lawsuit may have for victims of gun violence and the gun industry as a whole. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
July 19, 2023 en banc) (Op. by McCaffery, J.) [read post]