Search for: "MATTER OF K D K" Results 381 - 400 of 2,803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Issues relating to priority[1] The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request corresponds to the disclosure in the priority document D0 with the exception of the explicit mention of the value of total drive specific energy (SEC) of 0.330 kWh/kg. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The beta-casein A2, A3, D and E variants contain a proline at position 67 whereas in the beta-casein variants A1, B, C and F proline-67 is substituted by a histidine (see page 13, lines 24 to 27). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
This is not a description of the "method for transmitting data in a telecommunications network and switch for implementing said method" (page 4 of the opinion below) that is the subject matter of the patent dispute, but it is the petitioner's suggested process for reasoning through patent disputes. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
A similar conclusion was reached in decision T 603/89 [2.1(c)/(d), 2.6] in connection with a kind of template that displayed numbers on a card to represent notes on a keyboard instrument. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
That requirement cannot rely on excluded (non-technical) subject-matter alone, however original that matter might be. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:03 am by Sam E. Antar
Under Item 5.07 (d) of S.E.C. rules for filing an 8-K report, a company's decision on the frequency of its advisory vote involving executive compensation must be disclosed: (d) No later than one hundred fifty calendar days after the end of the annual or other meeting of shareholders at which shareholders voted on the frequency of shareholder votes on the compensation of executives.... [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It does not have any influence on the effect of the distinguishing features (a) to (d) and, when combined with the other features of claim 1, apparently does not give rise to any effect that has to be taken into account when inventive step is assessed.The problem[4.4] Considering the power tool according to the closest prior art D4 and taking into account the above mentioned effect of the distinguishing features (a) to (d), the problem to be solved corresponds to the first partial… [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:56 pm by Unknown
‘‘(D) An unmodified natural material, as that material exists in nature. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Based on listening to Sam and Brea's latest webcast, I thought I'd touch on a few points that I think are worth some discussion: Quality calls and e-mails Brea has received 44 calls/emails in the past 6 weeks. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
DOL Fiduciary Rule: Impact and Action Steps Posted by Maureen Gorman and Lennine Occhino, Mayer Brown LLP, on Friday, July 21, 2017 Tags: 401(k), Conflicts of interest, Contracts, DOL, ERISA, Fiduciary rule, Investment advisers, Retirement plans, Securities regulation The Leidos Mixup and the Misunderstood Duty to Disclose in Securities Law Posted by Matthew C. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In Step D of Example 14d (page 200), a process is disclosed for the synthesis of the present sodium salt, which is obtained as a “white solid”. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Even if (which the EBA is in no position to decide) the BoA did fail to acknowledge a correct method, that is not a matter which could lead to a finding of a fundamental violation of A 113(1). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This was not admissible under A 123(2) because at least conditions II and III of the essentiality test, i.e. that the missing further features were not, as such, indispensable for the function of the invention in the light of the technical problem they served to solve, and that the replacement and removal of these features did not require any real modification of other features [to compensate for the change], were not fulfilled.Assessment of an intermediate generalisation[2.3] The expression… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request under consideration as a whole includes a therapeutic method. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 12:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
” As for Daniels, he apparently sought to prevent teachers from assigning Zinn’s work in grades K-12. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
However, taking into account that the claim specifies that a computer is used and giving the wording “running a ... simulation” in step (d) of claim 1 the meaning it normally has in the relevant art, step (d) and, consequently, step (f) are understood as implying the use of the computer in order to repeatedly run a call handling simulation against the schedule. [read post]