Search for: "MATTER OF L K"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
Ronald K. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
By Gerald L. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the claim must clearly define the subject-matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
Gail L. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
” Now this may be right, but the claimed subject-matter is not a package per se but a packaged kit containing a syringe. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The facts of the case can be summarised as follows:On January 13, 2009, the ED had informed the applicant on its doubts regarding the patentability of the claimed subject-matter and had given him four months for remedying the deficiencies.On April 27, 2009, the applicant requested a two-month extension of the time limit because the communication between the Swiss applicant, the inventor (residing in Great Britain) and the German representative needed more time.On July 23, 2009, the… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
George Tucker III Research Professor George Washington University Lynne L. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
In reality, claimed subject-matter can be non obvious when starting from the “closest prior art†and obvious when starting from another prior art. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:07 pm
In reality, claimed subject-matter can be non obvious when starting from the “closest prior art†and obvious when starting from another prior art. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:32 pm
Rev. 841 *** Robert K. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
A great blessing no matter how you slice it. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 2:05 am
On 4 November 2015, the notary’s assistant refused to draw up a will containing the legacy ‘by vindication’ stipulated by Aleksandra Kubicka on the ground that creation of a will containing such a legacy is contrary to German legislation and case-law relating to rights in rem and land registration, which must be taken into consideration under Article 1(2)(k) and (l) and Article 31 of Regulation No 650/2012 and that, as a result, such… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Undoubtedly, these features define the claimed subject-matter as an apparatus or device, i.e. as a physical object. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:44 am
” K. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:00 am
Re (a): [2.2.1] In decision T 587/98, which concerns double patenting arising from a divisional application, the board concluded that A 125 was not applicable, as prohibition of conflicting claims would be a’ matter of substantive law rather than a matter of procedure (see [3.6] of the reasons). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This involves, inter alia, determining for which matter protection is to be sought, how many independent claims and of which category are required in order to adequately define the matter to be protected, and whether or not dependent claims are to be included and, if so, which particular embodiments these claims should be concerned with. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce, through Randel K. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:34 pm
Tara L. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 3:18 pm
Tara L. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
We take a look at two posts on the AIG matter. [read post]
