Search for: "MICHAEL E. v. ADES, D. E ."
Results 381 - 400
of 669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Hy-Grade Valve Inc (Gray on Claims) (Maier & Maier) (Docket Report) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Court’s ‘Greater familiarity with the law of false marking due to the hundreds of cases filed’ does not weigh against transfer of venue: Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) Columbia law expert on telecom, copyright to FTC (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California confirms no fair use exception to digital lock provisions under the DMCA: USA v Matthew Crippen (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Texas: Another Texas judge scrutinises mass copyright litigation: Steve Hardeman LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Peter Rost e-mailDr. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Stoughton Trailers, LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Unenforceable patent is ‘unpatented’ for false marking claim purposes: Promote Innovation v Medtronic (EDTexweblog.com) ITC reverses ALJ, finds no violation in Inv. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Filed September 15, 2009. 1107*1107 Michael G. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Brooks Bauer, Michael R. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
In the amended complaint, however, the McDonald's corporation was added as a defendant. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
TenXc Wireless v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(Michael Cassel v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
Van Valkenburgh (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: An ugly trademark ownership decision: Gemmer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
The government countered that the testimony was admissible as a statement of an unindicted coconspirator under FRE 801(d)(2)(E) and that the statement was in furtherance of the conspiracy. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Michael E. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
That turns out to be Michael Moulton, who produced electronic textbooks for Faulkner Press, which unsuccessfully sued the for-profit note site Einstein's Notes (Faulkner Press v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(1709 Blog) (Michael Geist) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Murphy (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court South Carolina – SEO/Web design consultant faces contributory trademark liability for ‘Copycat’ e-commerce site: Roger Cleveland Golf v. [read post]
