Search for: "Maker v. Maker"
Results 381 - 400
of 7,154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
The Strategy builds on sustained efforts by the Biden Administration to protect the nation’s critical infrastructure, including: The 2022 Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) – expands the reporting obligations of covered entities; The 2022 Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) Act – reduces reliance on China-based suppliers of emerging technologies by providing a financial incentive for investment in U.S. semiconductor… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:02 am
It is just this scenario that is at issue in a pending false advertising lawsuit, Finster v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The cyber strategy recognizes that new authorities will be required to set minimum cybersecurity requirements for certain sectors—such as “food and agriculture, government facilities, and ‘critical manufacturing’—including vaccine-makers, pharmaceuticals, and mask manufacturers”—therefore delaying regulation by federal agencies until Congress passes the appropriate legislation. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
[1] SEC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
This here is a follow-up on Nokia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:09 am
In practice, it's really a mix now of various intellectual property rights that software makers rely on: copyright, patents, trade secrets (particularly in the age of cloud computing), and trademarks.Copyright is meant to protect creative expression, such as art and literature. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
By 1993, the Supreme Court in Amitai v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm
"] From Judge Irene Berger's decision yesterday in Lomangino v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
[3] Jarkesy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:00 am
In J.N. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
About a month ago, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California further narrowed the class-action lawsuit against Qualcomm that sought to piggyback on FTC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:06 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Georg Werner) has meanwhile published (on a website run by the Bavarian state government) two Nokia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
" Schecter v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Compare LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Rather, the discussion was primarily about how to make private markets more accessible to retail investors (and whether the proposals lack investor protections), something very different from the discussions just five or six years ago when members puzzled about why there are fewer IPOs and, thus, fewer opportunities for retail investors to invest in new companies.Starting with the second hearing dealing with barriers small businesses face in raising capital is helpful because it spotlights the main… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:26 pm
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
