Search for: "Mann v Does"
Results 381 - 400
of 551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
Attorneys are free to select among reasonable courses of action in prosecuting clients’ cases without thereby exposing themselves to liability for malpractice (Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:54 am
Insider Trading Statutes V. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:01 am
SEC), the decision does not really criticize the economic analysis used by the Commission. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
Mann v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
” Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act US v Jason Pleau, et al – Federal Criminal Indictment 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Mann v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Mann, 22 Va. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
This morning Mr Justice Mann, sitting in the Chancery Division in [2012] EWHC 517 (Ch), allowed Emirates' appeal -- though this judgment does not address the cross-appeal. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court's ruling in Maples v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 7:06 am
Mann. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Ronald Mann reports on Tuesday’s arguments in Freeman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
Hurley and Moore v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2012] EWHC 201- read judgment This judgment, the latest in an expanding list of decisions on challenges to the Coalition government’s spending cuts, is an interesting example of judicial restraint and deference to the government on issues of macro-policy, at a time when the extent of judicial intervention into political decision-making is the subject of much debate in the legal profession and academia, thanks… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
In Whited v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Therefore, the MR concluded (at para 83): Accordingly, I would dismiss these appeals, as: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been 'commercial information or other intellectual property' within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not 'commercial information or other intellectual property', and, in Ms Phillips's case, the confidence may have been that of her… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
On 17 November 2010, Mann J held that Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on the PSI ([2010] EWHC 2952 (Ch)). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:42 am
Does it make a difference if: (i) the word mark is superimposed over the graphic device? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
Mann, 562 F.2d 1104, 1117 (8th Cir. 1977). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
This blog’s Ronald Mann provides analysis of the decision. [read post]
