Search for: "Manning v. USA" Results 381 - 400 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm by Dan Stein
As expected, today’s unanimous ruling in the gene-patenting case, Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Justice Roberts, with whom I rarely find myself in agreement (and would he stop with that smirky smile, already), got this much exactly right in U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
DHL Express (USA), Inc., 12-747. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 10:35 am by Alan Rozenshtein
Amnesty International USA denying standing to plaintiffs challenging the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program on the ongoing litigation in Hedges v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
John Wiley, it held that copyright law could not be used to prevent the parallel importation into the USA of works lawfully made outside of the USA. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 12:06 pm by Rajiv Kr. Choudhry
WILLMAR SCHWABE GMBH Abandoned Soumen Ghosh 402/CHENP/2004 SCHERING CORPORATION Revoked T V Madhusudhan 3969/CHENP/2007 TAIYO KAGAKU CO., LTD Granted* T V Madhusudhan 3497/CHENP/2006 VAAKYA TECHNOLOGIES  Granted V Saravanan 2894/CHENP/2007 SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD Abandoned V Saravanan 623/MUMNP/2006 OBSCHESTO S OGRANICHENNOI  Granted Vikash Sharma 560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec USA Refused Vikash Sharma 560/MUMNP/2006 Approtec… [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:01 am by Tim Sitzmann
(Imagine your grandchildren asking incredulously, “You mean the Volkswagen ‘V’ used to mean peace? [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
The Episcopal Church (USA) is a ship adrift on the seas of popular culture, carried hither and yon by the fads, inclinations and currents of the moment. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
Holmes probably believed what he wrote in Abrams, just as he believed what her wrote in Schenck v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
The criticism that copyright is a “monopoly” is often bandied about. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am by Charon QC
The last two weeks of planning since my move to Kent have been both enjoyable and productive. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
The Federal crime of Money Laundering is traditionally understood to be the practice of filtering “dirty” money, or ill-gotten gains, through a series of transactions until the funds are “clean,” or appear to be proceeds from legal activities. [read post]