Search for: "Mark" Results 381 - 400 of 135,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
Senado Federal / CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Daniel Alexander QC) Planetart LLC and another v Photobox Ltd and another[2020] EWHC 713 (Ch) (25 March 2020) This was an action for trade mark infringement. passing off and invalidation of one of the defendant's trade marks. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:05 am by Mark Cobb
With over 25 years of experience with construction law, Mark Cobb is proud to be an author of the newest construction publication of the American Bar Associations’ Forum on Construction Law. [read post]
Denver Financial Advisor Mark Barrand Named in Pending Customer Disputes  Mark Allen Barrand, an Ameriprise Financial broker based in Denver, has nine customer claims on his BrokerCheck record. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:23 am by Ron Coleman
Republished by Blog Post PromoterThe TTABlog comments on a TTAB decision finding, not surprisingly, that two similar looking trademarks are likely to be confused, but raises a key point about how the brand-equity-rich really are different: I think the marks PLAYBOY and PLAY BODY are just too dang similar in spelling: [...] [read post]
12 Oct 2024, 1:46 am by Ron Coleman
Polo Assocation) and the (new) preposterously rich (Ralph Lauren): The US Polo Association filed a suit against Ralph Lauren claiming that the fashion giant is trying to make money […] The post Mark-o! [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:23 am by Dennis Crouch
There are several reasons why the onslaught of false marking litigation should be seen as merely a temporary flash in the pan. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 9:15 am by William P. Ramey-III
It is well-established that a non-practicing entity (NPE) does not have to mark products to collect damages for patent infringement. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 9:15 am by William P. Ramey-III
It is well-established that a non-practicing entity (NPE) does not have to mark products to collect damages for patent infringement. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 3:23 pm by Daily Record Staff
Formerly Marks, Thomas Architects, the architecture firm will now be named Marks Thomas. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by imagine
Choosing the correct trademark symbol for your mark depends on what you are selling under your mark and whether you have registered it. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:19 am
“The Government wants to change the rules on the registering of trade marks to encourage more people to register marks. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 8:28 pm by The Dear Rich Staff
You can oppose a mark for any reason that registration would be refused. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:34 am
If the mark has not been in use for a three-year period, Section 45 of the Act creates a presumption of abandonment and the mark owner bears the burden to produce evidence that it did not abandon the mark - i.e. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:46 am by Dennis Crouch
The Marking Requirement: Here is how the marking statute has been interpreted. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:36 am
The Board found the marks similar in sound and appearance, noting that consumers are inclined to focus on the first word or portion of a mark. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by I. India Thusi
Continue reading "Un-Marking Rape Victims"The post Un-Marking Rape Victims appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm by Paul Bost
”  The Board also found no reason to distinguish between a mark consisting of a single color and a mark, like Forney’s, consisting of multiple colors. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:10 am
The three stripes in applicant's mark may be displayed at the same direction and angle as the adidas mark. [read post]