Search for: "Mark Counts"
Results 381 - 400
of 8,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
What the Court also had to consider was whether the mark was a figurative or a position mark, and whether that was an irrelevant fact for the determination of genuine use.Does it really count if I signed on a dotted line? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:17 pm
§ 1114• Count II: Federal Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin 15 .S.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
§ 1125(c)(2)(C) happens when the reputation of the famous mark is damaged by association with a similar mark. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Practice Tip: Franchise agreements typically require the franchisee to cease using all of the franchise marks, as well as return all items bearing the franchise marks, in the event the franchise agreement is terminated. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
Here’s what Alessandro writes:High Court reins in polo-themed trade mark claimsby Alessandro CerriIn a recent judgment, the High Court of England and Wales (the Court), acting also as a European Union Trade Mark Court, found that Lifestyle Equities’ trade mark rights in the BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB mark had not been infringed by the Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club.BackgroundThis case concerns the latest instance of litigation brought by Lifestyle… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:39 am
Here’s what they did: Researchers counted the number of tattoos and piercings (and noted just where on the body the markings or piercings were located) and then assessed ‘deviance’ (in the form of marijuana use, occasional use of other drugs, being arrested for a crime, cheating on college work, binge drinking, and/or having multiple sex partners). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:46 am
Mark Liberman (Language Log) has long been on the warpath against claims that the number of “I“‘s in some speech are a proxy for narcissism or some such. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
A jury on May 31 acquitted Edwards on one of six counts and deadlocked on the others, marking a setback for the prosecutors who brought the novel legal case. [read post]
10 May 2007, 7:29 am
I've mentioned the three-year-rule before, but we're now past the four-year mark (five if you count Afghanistan). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
Lesson# 3 Actual Use Still Counts A federally-registered trademark is presumed valid, but that does not make it invincible. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:36 am
Have any suggestions for the 3 Count? [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 4:33 pm
by Nicole Flatow Saturday marks one year since Rosemary Marquez was nominated to fill a judicial emergency seat in the District of Arizona, a jurisdiction so overwhelmed with immigration and drug cases that the chief judge has said it might be difficult to find anyone willing to accept a nomination. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:25 am
It claims that Defendants are using those marks and/or marks that are substantially similar. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
The newspaper quotations are running 10-1 in favor of the president being an officer on a conservative estimate and, if I count quotations that have turned up in other writings, the ratio is probably more than 20 to 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
It tacked on counts for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution, all of which claims were dismissed because the defendant does not currently use the VAGISAN mark in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
That way, you know the recount is counting the ballots that the voter actually marked. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:00 pm
Mark R. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:07 pm
Landmark also has a pending federal trademark application for "Landmark Sign Group" that seeks intellectual property protection for the mark in connection with services not listed in its currently registered federal trademark. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
However, the applicant argued that the trade mark at stake departed significantly from the norm of the field because the number of stripes depicted in it was unusual: since that number was limited to 5, consumers could have easily identified them as a distinctive sign of its products [indeed, agrees Merpel: counting the stripes on shoes’ sides could be the new barcode -- 5 stripes correspond to K-Swiss; 3 is Adidas; 4 is Paciotti; 2 is MarcaMode’s; one is… [read post]
In 2016, How Often Did the TTAB Affirm Section 2(d) Refusals? 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals?
10 Jan 2017, 4:58 am
[A high water mark for the last few years]. [read post]
