Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 381 - 400 of 10,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In a trademark case, a plaintiff may be harmed by virtue of losing exclusive control over its own mark…. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 9:23 am
  "Dilution by tarnishment" means an association arising from the similarity between a mark or trade name and the famous mark that harms the reputation of the famous mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
And, of course, there is Mark Graber's magnificent book on Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Cottrell argued that IFEBP didn’t show harm causation from her alleged use of its marks and that its claims failed because they weren’t competitors. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Once the PTO approves the proposed standard, the owner of the mark would be charged with policing uses of the mark. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The court awarded fees incurred after the summary judgment order, over half a million dollars.Sazerac alleged that Fetzer’s 1000 Stories red zinfandel buffalo mark and trade dress infringed Sazerac’s BUFFALO TRACE word mark, Buffalo logos, and trade dress for its BUFFALO TRACE bourbon whiskey. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” Though “the proper remedy for infringing use of a mark on a site generally falls short of entirely prohibiting use of the site’s domain name,” “EWS cannot legitimately claim nominative fair use of a URL that is comprised solely of two of DAMA-I’s incontestable marks, and it will not be disproportionately harmed by migrating its operations to a different URL. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:41 am
" Among the 75 players -- Mark Duper, a former wide receiver for the Dolphins, as well as Ottis Anderson and Rodney Hampton, both former running backs for the Giants. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:49 am
Kissing is so important.Tracy Davies, 40, bit off a third of Mark Coghill's tongue after telling him "you never give me smoochy kisses any more. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 12:45 pm by Broussard, David & Moroux
This year marks the 50th anniversary of practicing law for one of Broussard, David & Moroux’s founding partners, Richard C. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:01 pm
Tonight marks the onset of the Jewish New Year and with it, the ten days of Awe culminating in Yom Kippur. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:35 pm by Duke Law Journal
Volume 60 April 2011 Number 7 Article Environmental Harms, Use Conflicts, and Neutral Baselines in Environmental Law Todd S. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
I don’t agree with the commenters who argue that the T.T.A.B. is correct in thinking that "association" automatically proves that it is likely (probable) that the famous mark will be harmed and lose strength. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am by Léon Dijkman
In all other cases, there is no harm in simply finding conceptual dissimilarity and then applying the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:43 am by Afro-Buff
This is an invitation to a roundtable discussion on the harm of illicit trade and the role of trade mark counterfeiting within the pharmaceutical industry organised by the Companies & Intellectual Property Commission in association with the South African Liquor Brand Owners Association.The roundtable is part of a series that envisages examining the role of counterfeiting as part of illicit trade in the various industry sectors. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:24 am by Gritsforbreakfast
A second Texas prisoner passed the 30-years-in-solitary mark last Monday. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 1:02 am
"By all criteria, the Vancouver facility has both saved lives and contributed toward the decreased use of illicit drugs and the reduced spread of HIV infection and other blood-borne infections," Mark Wainberg, the director of the McGill University AIDS Centre in Montreal, wrote in a commentary published alongside the study. [read post]
No longer can they insist that the competitor seeking to resist disclosure must demonstrate competitive harm – let alone substantial competitive harm. [read post]