Search for: "Markes v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 10,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm
Then a draft of a amicus brief Lemly filed today with the United States Supreme Court arrived in my inbox and I knew this was the issue that would make for an excellent interview. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
Baringer; James R BullmanSource of Law: United StatesLouisianaCourt Name: United States District Court, Middle District of LouisianaLegal Counsel: Stephen G. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
Baringer; James R BullmanSource of Law: United StatesLouisianaCourt Name: United States District Court, Middle District of LouisianaLegal Counsel: Stephen G. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
United States, vacated the decision of the Seventh Circuit, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
Slip Op. 09813 at *13-14, but, in doing so, specifically stated that it did not recognize the famous marks doctrine as an independent theory of liability under state law. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
This discussion has addressed the requirement that a proposed trademark be "used" or be "in use" when a trademark registration is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
It’s available in most stores across the United States…except for Wisconsin. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
On July 27, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, threw out claims that Maker’s Mark violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), ruling that the plaintiffs did not plausibly allege a likelihood of deception. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
