Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
" Lodestar then began use its mark in the United States in 2014.Lodestar won the priority battle but lost the trademark infringement war. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known resolution to date. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
Case date: 12 January 2024 Case number: No. 21-55881 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
According to Section 45, a mark is used in commerce "on services when [1] it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and [2] the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: "A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: “A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:18 am
By: Geoffrey Dureska [6/17/22] THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DENIES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN CASE CONCERNING TIME TRAVELING, KNIFE-WEILDING, WESTERN ATTIRED HEROES WITH KNIGHTLY HERITAGE In late 2021, The Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Oh sure, we all begin with the statement in Marks v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 12:55 am
Case date: 28 January 2025 Case number: No. 23-1195 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European… [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
Brunetti (Case No. 18-302), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is appealing to the Supreme Court from a U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
From Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
