Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
The Justice Department argues that none of the theories advanced by the EEOC, and the Seventh Circuit in its Hively v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
The court also granted a separate petition from the Justice Department. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
The Chief Justice responded: “General Holder, on behalf of the Court, I welcome you as the chief law officer of the United States government and as an officer of this Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
Department of Justice. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
Department of Justice. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Rather, in Wilson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
At the blog noncuratlex, Professor Kyle Graham posts a memorandum written by Chief Justice Roberts when he was a young White House attorney, addressing the Department of Justice’s proposal to add new computer crimes to the federal code. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am
This combination of preference for religious practices with an attack on the establishment clause marks the religion-clause jurisprudence of the conservative justices now on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
Elena Chachko discussed EU sanctions and international humanitarian law in her examination of the Court of Justice of the European Union case, A v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
“It would be made upon the government of the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Today marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Department of Defense, which asks whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s definition of the “waters of the United States” must be brought in federal district court or in a federal court of appeals, observing that the “Supreme Court has likely stepped in to resolve this dispute because it is a waste of judicial resources for federal courts of appeals to decide whether WOTUS regulations are lawful if they don’t have the… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
The disclosure to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) unit marked an acknowledgement that a portion of Manafort’s lobbying work on behalf of former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych aimed to influence U.S. government officials and journalists. [read post]
