Search for: "Marquette v. Marquette"
Results 381 - 400
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
Okay, so I’m back from vacation and trying to stay abreast of what’s going on with the Kramer & Kaslow mass joinder lawsuits, which are being tried by attorney Phillip Kramer whom I interviewed in late February after I received copies of mailings from homeowners soliciting participation in a lawsuit settlement that I found deceptive or misleading. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:49 am
California and Hugo Black in Adamson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:18 am
In Appling v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:34 am
Congratulations to Melissa Hart (Colorado) and our own Paul Secunda (Marquette), whose 2009 Fordham Law Review article on social framework evidence was quoted heavily in a New York Times article on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:34 am
Congratulations to Melissa Hart (Colorado) and our own Paul Secunda (Marquette), whose 2009 Fordham Law Review article on social framework evidence was quoted heavily in a New York Times article on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:46 am
" Says Marquette lawprof Rick Esenburg. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
Similarly, in Printz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:30 am
The controversy over one of those cases, Williams v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:59 am
[Cross-posted on the Marquette Law Faculty Blog.] [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:30 am
A Comparative Overview in 16 Countries (HUMA Network, Nov. 2010) [text]Most Important United States Supreme Court Case in Refugee Law: I.N.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:03 pm
(For the record, I’m no fan of the Daubert rule and my encomium to the Wisconsin rule is set out in an article in the Marquette Law Review.) [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:49 pm
Now available online, the recently published student comments in the Marquette Law Review cover a wide range of topics. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
The seven IP professors' brief, by Marquette Law professor Bruce Boyden, argues that the district court did not properly consider the "red flags" of infringement standard. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
(I was in the audience) in which four law professors (Don Elliott of Yale, Martin Redish and Ronald Allen of Northwestern, and Rick Esenberg of Marquette) outlined ideas for reforming the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to reduce discovery costs and improve screening of cases in the earliest stages of filing. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:39 pm
Esenberg of Marquette University Law School; Prof. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 pm
On December 8, in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:45 pm
Elias-Zacarias (Marquette Univ. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:45 pm
Elias-Zacarias (Marquette Univ. [read post]
