Search for: "Martin by and Through Martin v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm
When faith leads to social action, however, otherwise impossible results can include the election of Blacks to local, state, and federal office, with the most significant being the election and reelection of Barack Obama, the first Black president of the United States of America. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
My Office in Mauritania will continue to work with the Government and civil society to further human rights through constructive dialogue, including on the right to a fair trial. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
As I explain in the post, within hours after Ali refused to step forward for military induction, the New York State Athletic Commission withdrew his license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; and, within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, thereby effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
By Glen Hansen Friends Of Martin's Beach v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:48 am
Without dissent, the United States Supreme Court has once again summarily reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
When we last spoke for the United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
In the case of Shea v News Ltd (No.2) [2016] WASC 146 Kenneth Martin J considered a number of issues arising in a libel claim brought by plaintiffs who were children at the time of the publications complain [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Kingsfield Holdings v Rutherford ([2016] WASC 117) Kenneth Martin J dismissed a slander claim in respect of 15 words published to one person. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
The other speakers on my panel were Probir Mehta (lead U.S. negotiator of the IP portion of the TPP), Pedro Velasco Martins (lead EU negotiator of the IP portion of the TTIP), and Daren Tang (lead Singapore negotiator of the IP portion of the TPP). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
Lockheed Martin, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, from around 1950 through 1970, decedent worked as an aviation mechanic for the United States Air Force. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
The majority held in the Dred Scott case that a slave was not a citizen of the United States and therefore did not have the requisite status to be a part of a suit in federal court. [read post]
