Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 381 - 400
of 722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
The goal of the funding riders is to overrule the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am
New York State, which supports the Tailoring Rule, has been joined in the motion to intervene by California, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:34 pm
The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
The City of Pittsfield, Massachusetts asks the Appeals Court to consider whether EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) improperly declined Pittsfield's petition seeking the Board's review of EPA's grant of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the Pittsfield Wastewater Treatment Plant. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
(See Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:08 pm
The Supreme Court upheld this authority in its landmark 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
Obviously there are exceptions — Congress can’t overturn Citizens United or Heller, but it can reverse Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:02 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
EPA, ruling that the EPA could regulate greenhouse gases and that Massachusetts could sue the EPA for failing to do so, is the most important environmental decision in a generation. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:05 pm
The legislative activity stems from the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
EPA (standing) and Atkins v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:47 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 467 U.S. 837 (1984) and Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:45 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
New Jersey (requiring a jury verdict before a criminal sentence may be increased), and Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 am
The EPA may believe that the it is not practicable to apply the express terms of the Clean Air Act to GHGs, but that is not the agency’s call to make, especially not after the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:58 pm
The EPA rules announced today are the next step forward in carrying out the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
