Search for: "Mattel Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
Mattel, Inc. (2008) __ U.S. __ [128 S.Ct. 1396, 1404-1405] (Hall Street).) [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
Mattel, Inc., the court held that the doctrine of manifest disregard of the law is no longer a valid basis for overturning arbitration awards. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:59 pm
It listed its largest unsecured creditors as Honeywell Nylon LLC, owed $3.2 million; Southern Polymer Inc., owed $1.3 million; and Domo, owed $1.1 million. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:49 pm
., determined Thursday that MGA Entertainment's hugely popular Bratz dolls (pictured left) were designed while the designer worked for Barbie's home, Mattel Inc. . . . [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
June 27, 2008).In the first decision, ALS & Associates, Inc. f/k/a Southeast Floating Docks, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
Designer created Bratz while at Mattel, jury says (pdf) Mattel Inc., maker of the Barbie doll, won a jury verdict concluding a former employee made original drawings of MGA Entertainment Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 9:28 am by Ann
Mattel Inc, the creators of the Barbie doll enterprise and the world's largest toy maker, has won its copyright infringement claim against MGA Entertainment Inc, the marketers of the Bratz line of dolls since 2001. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:28 pm
., determined Thursday that MGA Entertainment’s hugely popular Bratz dolls (pictured left) were designed while the designer worked for Barbie’s home, Mattel Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:31 am
But their use can raise red flags in a legal dispute.When British software developers came up with a program that could wipe files from computer hard drives, they gave it a hard-core name: Evidence Eliminator.It gets the point across, but can sure sound bad if a user gets hauled into court and is accused of illegally destroying documents.That's what happened in the high-stakes trial, now in federal court in Riverside, over who owns the rights to the hugely successful Bratz line of dolls.Toy… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:59 am
But their use can raise red flags in a legal dispute.When British software developers came up with a program that could wipe files from computer hard drives, they gave it a hard-core name: Evidence Eliminator.It gets the point across, but can sure sound bad if a user gets hauled into court and is accused of illegally destroying documents.That's what happened in the high-stakes trial, now in federal court in Riverside, over who owns the rights to the hugely successful Bratz line of dolls.Toy… [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 9:28 pm
Mattel, Inc., 128 S.Ct 1396 (2008), arose from a dispute concerning the responsibility for clean-up of a manufacturing site when excessive levels of pollutants were found in the property's well water. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
Mattel, Inc, a toymaker, argued to lawmakers that the company should be permitted to conduct its own certification tests, meaning that their own labs will test for product defects in their toys. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Mattel Inc. is an enthusiastic litigant. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.June 5, 2008 - 2 PM: Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 May 2008, 5:43 am
That is going to be the flash-point of the future.If this is depressing to fair use proponents, a great case to mention is Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]