Search for: "Matter of Hammer v Hammer"
Results 381 - 400
of 444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2009, 1:12 pm
As of 3:58 Eastern Time, the docket doesn't reflect the freeing, though it does recount the January 5 date.John Kindley at People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 6:57 pm
See Rivera v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:18 am
App. 4th 1100 (1996), as could a pit bull, People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
Those lawyers-Texas solo Dan Perez and Michigan-based Patrick Anderson, both of whom frequently work for Spangenberg and his patent companies-quickly hammered out the $4.2 million settlement. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
But in view of the fact that plaintiff's chance of prevailing at trial became less and less likely as the defense pressed on, no alternative is realistically possible.Miller v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:34 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Carter has granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the pending lawsuit of Smelt v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:24 pm
The Justice Department filed papers today in federal court in California in the case of Smelt and Hammer v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
She is freaking hammered anyway. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
Georgia that some death penalty laws enacted in the wake of Furman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
No matter what her nougaty, wise, empathetic he [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 5:48 pm
Keay v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Congress has handed the Plaintiffs a massive hammer to combat copyright infringement, and they have chosen to use it. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
No matter how much we may want to fudge it - indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory - the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
See Page v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
And again, as a policy matter, I think it's better to err on the side of admitting false accusations evidence in these kinds of cases. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
An opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of power and wrest complete control over the company can constitute irreparable injury (see Vanderminden v Vanderminden, 226 AD2d 1037, 1041 [1996]; Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners [Offshore] Ltd., 17 Misc 3d 1137A, *8 [2007]; see also Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 AD2d 363, 366 [1985]). [read post]
