Search for: "Matter of Hong v Hong" Results 381 - 400 of 464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 12:10 am by Steve Lombardi
Of course none of this is a laughing matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:26 am by David Lat
(For our lawyers working on designated pro bono matters, the 1700 billable/2100 core hours requirement applies.) [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am by Ilya Somin
Proximity and cultural compatibility also matter, for example. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am by Adam Wagner
This was so, even where the subject matter was not within the public domain. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm by IP Dragon
There will be a consultation to expand the scope of plant varieties in China to include fruit as well.- (IV) Examination and cooperation- (V) Industry cooperation, in the patent and trademark industries.- (VI) Authentication Service; copyrighted works needed to be first certified in Hong Kong. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Matthew Hill
The Court of Appeal held that as this was so on the basis of racial discrimination, it would also have been the case for age discrimination had this been a matter considered in Purja. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
The authorities on which they relied (Attorney-General of Hong Kong v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
Forum Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti, Lis Alibi Pendens and Related Actions in Civil and Commercial Matters Within the European Judicial Area; Caroline Kleiner, Money in Private International Law: What Are the Problems? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
  Pill LJ pointed out that, in an analysis of the law of fair comment in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal case of Tse Wai Chun Pau v Albert Cheng ([2001] EMLR 31), Lord Nicholls had said “the comment must explicitly or implicitly indicate, at least in general terms, what are the facts on which the comment is being made. [read post]