Search for: "Matter of Inquiry to Advisory Committee"
Results 381 - 391
of 391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Opposition to MDPs The strongest and most persuasive argument against the MDP is that the American Bar Association (or ABA) opposes it, voting overwhelmingly against them in their last meeting addressing the matter. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 2:48 am
As a policy matter, how do you get a handle on a problem this big? [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
These are:Regulatory matters requiring "application of specialized scientific and public health knowledge" would instead be decided by innumerable non-expert juries. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:07 pm
" It noted that the advisory committee's notes provide seven factors to inform the specific "good cause" inquiry required under Rule 26(b)(2)(B): (1) the specificity of the discovery request; the quantity of information available from other and more easily accessed sources; (2) the failure to produce relevant information that seems likely to have existed but is no longer available on more easily accessed sources; (4) the… [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
If states (or others, for that matter) thought that any particular type of product liability litigation should escape preemption and the FDA had gotten it wrong, they could file a citizen's petition or seek an informal opinion from the FDA seeking an exemption (we don't claim to be regulatory lawyers, but we don't think there's a formal exception process for drugs, since there's no express preemption, see 62 Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:20 pm
Nacchio was Chairman and CEO of Qwest and was serving pursuant to the President's appointment as the Chairman of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, Qwest was approached to permit the Government access to the private telephone records of Qwest customers. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
Id. at *2.Recognizing that the advisory committee comments to the 1993 amendments to Fed. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
Although the rule itself is permissive, the Advisory Committee clearly intended the two factors set forth in Rule 36(b) to be central to the analysis. . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
"For a copy of the Committee's advisory opinion, please use this link: Opinion 07-25 [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
This inquiry forecloses plaintiff's cause of action. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Section 110(f) of NHPA provides that "[p]rior to the approval of any Federal undertaking which may directly and adversely affect any National Historic Landmark" the agency "shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions as may be necessary to minimize harm to such landmark, and shall afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking. [read post]
