Search for: "Matter of Jonathan T."
Results 381 - 400
of 2,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
For those who haven’t followed it, here’s the backstory. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:36 am
I skip here that substantive question, a matter I haven't at all studied, and focus on the pseudonymization question: We first explain why we deny defendant's request to refer to him by his initials in this opinion. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm
" —Cornel West, professor, Harvard University, and author of Democracy Matters; and Robert P. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:32 pm
(Thanks to Jonathan Adler at VC for linking to the decision.) [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:24 pm
To be clear, this isn’t a right or wrong issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
Thom Lambert and Jonathan Barnett both have interesting posts on the matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:57 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
What matters is that the rift within the political party in question was a very public matter in which the pursuer and others could legitimately be exposed to criticism”. [29] In addition, the judge found that the statements by Mr Sheridan were privileged as “reply to attack”. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:36 am
Lawyers, no matter how deeply they feel the responsibility of their position, still need to eat, put a roof over their heads and occasionally drive a car. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
” Accordingly, it doesn’t matter how an employer normally treats servicemembers who are deployed on active duty. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
We won't know until we see it, of course, but from the press release it doesn't look good. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
First, unlike changing the law or its application which requires all to adjust, only applicants dissatisfied with the status quo would see a change. 85% of office actions don’t even include a PSM rejection I’ve found previously. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
But it does mean that the precedents Jonathan cites aren't determinative. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:26 pm
That probably doesn't bode well for the Biden Administration's chances of winning.] [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:42 am
Isn’t that rich? [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am
This is a guest post by Jonathan Holt of Garden Court North Chambers. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
Introduction – Jonathan H. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:08 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
