Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 381 - 400
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
”), and State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
See Delaware v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale (with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Kerr agreed). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
Hamblen J had considered whether the matters relied on by Fish & Fish had any significance to the commission of the tort, as another way of considering whether SSUK had combined to secure the doing of acts which proved to be tortious. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:46 am
The lawfulness of the cap was addressed by the Supreme Court in R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
The leading judgment in the Supreme Court was given by the President, Lord Neuberger (with whom Lords Kerr and Reed agreed). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Importantly as Lord Neuberger expressly recognized at [69] (in agreement with Lord Kerr) the Court of Appeal were wrong to confine themselves to the question “whether the decision-maker had approached the matter rationally, lawfully and in a procedurally correct manner”. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
The Supreme Court has announced [pdf] that permission to appeal has been granted (by Lords Kerr, Wilson and Reed) in the case of PNM v Times Newspapers. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Held: allowing the appeal; it would be a mistake to view patients as uninformed, incapable of understanding medical matters, or wholly dependent on information from doctors. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
. in Hahn v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:12 pm
On Tuesday of this week, the en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
Orin Kerr, on the twitters, questioned what experience was at stake: Also, what “experience” matters? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
., United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
The case of Entick v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
”); In the Matter of a Warrant for All Content and Other Info. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
So I thought I would flag the opinion today in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
” Brinegar v. [read post]
