Search for: "Matter of Lopez v Lopez"
Results 381 - 400
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
’ The next day [Evans’] computer was seized by Officer Lopez. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:02 pm
Bar v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Lopez, 845 S.W.2d 808, 809 (Tex.1992) ("[I]t is the character and function of an order that determine its classification."). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:45 am
Filburn and Gonzales v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
Health care is a matter reserved to the states. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 8:27 am
” Background In EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:38 pm
Flores-Lopez, 670 F.3d 803, 809-10 (7th Cir. 2012) (looking at risk to officer safety and preservation of evidence), and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:04 am
Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
White v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Nonetheless, I have come to think that just as in the run-up to Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
In 2015, one year after the court decided the Kohl case, the same court of appeals ruled for the defendant in Lopez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:52 am
He initially identified himself as Oscar Lopez, but at some unspecified later time he provided his true name. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Lopez, 458 Mass. 383 (2010)) or temporary tenants (Oystead v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
But it does explain why conservative justices who oppose economic regulations of business and high tax rates on the wealthy as a matter of policy have resisted the temptation to subject such laws to serious Equal Protection review. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
However, the Eleventh Circuit cited Lopez v. [read post]