Search for: "Matter of Nichols"
Results 381 - 400
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
[…] The court reviewed DuPont’s statements in the SAAC and subsequent motions concerning reformation and found that DuPont had misrepresented its subjective belief, an element of reformation that was to be decided as a matter of fact. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am
Additionally, Wachtell has assured the Court that its attorneys who obtained confidential Dow information have not and will not share Dow’s client confidences with the Wachtell attorneys working on this matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:21 am
The SEC has rules to safeguard confidential information - so knowledge about the details of specific matters and facts are limited to those working on the matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
[But why does that mean it should matter to the fair use analysis?] [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
” Nichol v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
Michelle Nichols reports for Reuters. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
This could be a recipe for confusion” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [22], Lord Nicholls). [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:03 pm
(d) Conduct which is capable of raising or contributing to an important matter of public debate. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Why the government has chosen this moment to blow the dust off them and poke a stick in the pond is a matter of speculation. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Vance is the least significant of the cases because the information Mazars provides to the grand jury will almost certainly stay in the grand jury: Just as under federal law, New York law mandates strict secrecy with respect to matters and information before a grand jury. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
In particular, the explanation at [4] of the way in which the rights protected by Articles 8 and 10 have been absorbed into the long-established action for breach of confidence was approved by Lord Nicholls in Campbell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
As to a public figure, one can only be held liable if he or she knows that the statement is false and that it defames another person, or if he or she acts in reckless disregard of such matters. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
As Moses LJ put it: “That he police are pursuing an investigation of corruption against a fellow police officer is a matter of public interest because corruption undermines the necessary public trust in those responsible for upholding the law and protecting the public. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
After all, as Lord Nicholls pointed out, why should someone’s intention affect a comment’s usefulness to public debate? [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:26 am
Such practice was foreseen as only acceptable where the complained matter consists of related material. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:37 am
“The record makes clear that the challenged subpoenas are protected legislative acts,” Nichols wrote in the decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
(citing Nichols v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit, for example, in Nichols v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
He endorsed Lord Nicholls observations in Campbell that the courts needed to guard against using as a touchstone a test which imported considerations which were properly part of the proportionality assessment rather than the engagement or ambit of Article 8. [read post]
