Search for: "Matter of SL"
Results 381 - 399
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
SLS Residential Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:09 pm
The SL&P post also points to Ann Althouse's post, in which she describes the case as "perhaps the most interesting case I've seen in 20 years. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:14 pm
SL&P puts the case into perspective here. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update.]Millenium Park, ChicagoSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: TTAB Finds Water and Soy Shake Mix Related, Sustains 2(d) Opposition to "REVIVAL WATER" TTAB Decides "FIRST NIAGARA" Oppositions After CAFC Reversal on Issue of Use Finding Wine-Imbibing Consumers More Susceptible to Confusion, TTAB Deems "SAURUS" and "LAURUS" Confusingly Similar Precedential No. 36: TTAB Finds Paper… [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:36 am
SL&P has more here and here. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:28 pm
., 104 F.3d 267, 271 (9th Cir.1996) (holding the plaintiff's evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to rebut the strong same-actor inference). [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:18 am
On the flip side, the SL model gives unlimited ownership, but no pre-written storyline to speak of. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:10 pm
(Take a look at SL&P stuff on snitches recently, it puts these things into context.) [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
So parsimony does matter after all. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
SL Green Realty Corp. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:19 pm
In this experiment the feeder cells were Sl/Sl mouse fibroblasts transfected with human membrane associated Stem Cell Factor (Sl.sup.4 h220 cells from Dr. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 8:18 am
SL&P comments here. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 1:45 pm
But does it matter? [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 2:24 am
The following week, however, is a different matter. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 9:42 am
Traffic may continue to increase, but the promise of law blogging - a more direct and speedy influence on matters of public concern - will fade. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:54 pm
The First concedes that its precedent on summary charts is "opaque" and tries to clarify matters. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
Tnx SL&P (which has interesting comments). [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
But that is of no matter if the AEDPA language "second or successive petition" in 2244(b) merely incoporporated pre-AEDPA case law. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In my view, rather than seeking rehearing before the Court at this stage, DOJ will likely wait to see what the District Court does on remand and then appeal the matter if the District Court actually considers the disparity between state and federal sentences. [read post]
