Search for: "Matter of T S B" Results 381 - 400 of 19,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 4:10 am by SHG
[N]ot knowing that the vehicle’s driver was a police officer had no bearing on whether Rupp’s shout was speech on a matter of public concern. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Under 8.01-233(B), however, “[i]f the subject matter of the counterclaim…arises out of the same transaction or occurrence upon which the plaintiff’s claim is based, the statute of limitations with respect to [the counterclaim] shall be tolled by the commencement of the plaintiff’s action. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Agents often earn a small commission from the works that their principals purchase, while a seller or dealer keeps the difference between what they purchased the work for and what they made off it.[12] B. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … "Citing nonexistent case law or misrepresenting the holdings of a case is making a false statement to a court[;] [i]t does not matter if [generative A.I.] told you so. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:49 am by SHG
No matter, because either way, there is nothing here that would constitute an impeachable offense. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff then filed a Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the judgment, claiming that the undisclosed evidence amounted to fraud and misrepresentation. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Daniel J. Gilman
We don’t know, partly because we don’t have a neat consensus model of the optimal tradeoffs. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am by David Post
There is another injury, of course, and it is the one that really matters, for the two of us, given our particular circumstances. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm by Guest Author
This doesn’t always mean that states have to reduce the burden on speech to an absolute minimum, but it does require states to avoid burdening speech in a manner that is “substantially broader than necessary to achieve the government’s interest. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Appeals Criminal Law: Stays; ss.10(b) & 7; s. 24(1) StandingR. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(b) Is The Move Even Far Enough To Qualify As A Relocation? [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by SHG
Greenberg received “many, many emails … as a result of [Defendant’s] incitement,” including one stating “[t]he emails, the calls, they won’t stop until you do the right thing and FIRE HIM …. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Even if the Justices may not agree that Griffin's Case was right as a matter of first principles, all of the Justices seem to see the wisdom in Chase's opinion. [read post]