Search for: "Maxwell v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Its formal first reading was on 26 May 2010 and its second reading on 9 July 2010: In response to the Bill, the new Government stated a commitment to bring forward its own proposals. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:52 am
In Maxwell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
The second is the appointment of a brand new team member, to cover developments in the United States -- the highly respected (despite the fact that he's a friend of the IPKat) Professor David C. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
In the case of Robert Willis v Elvin Maxwell 11-09-00275-CV the Texas Court of Appeals held that an official at Texas Tech University did not defame a student by repeating allegations that the student had pulled a gun on a classmate. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Would Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:34 pm
In 1984, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am
Other examples cited were the case of fraud involving former employees of the Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) in 2017, and the 2005 SFO investigation into systematic fraud involving the Sweet and Maxwell publishers. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
Allen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
United States, No. 10-587C (March 29, 2011). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
If it meant only that it would be pointless to state it. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
He sat as a First Tier Information Rights Tribunal Judge for ten years until retirement in 2017 and is the author of Celebrity and Royal Privacy, the Media and the Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Sweet & Maxwell, Lord on Chapter 7, p. 272) [ix] Justice R.V. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
