Search for: "Mcdonald" Results 381 - 400 of 9,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 12:00 pm by mceadm
Fifteen hourly workers from across the country have filed complaints against McDonald’s alleging serious incidents of sexual harassment. [read post]
24 May 2021, 6:00 am by Ryan J. Farrick
The lawsuit alleges that McDonald's allocates only a small percentage of its marketing budget to Black-owned media companies, despite African-Americans comprising 40% of the food chain's clientele. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 8:30 pm by Brianna Smith
Earlier this year, two former McDonald's employees filed a racial discrimination lawsuit against the company and were recently fired as a result. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 8:23 am by Peter Charles
As a result of these claims and protests, McDonald’s has promised to make all workers undergo anti-harassment training. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:37 pm by Patrick
One person was hurt after two pickup trucks, an SUV and a passenger car collided near the intersection of McDonald and Loop 323. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
To McDonald's chagrin, their competitors are already taking advantage of the opportunity. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
To McDonald's chagrin, their competitors are already taking advantage of the opportunity. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:16 am by Brian Wolfman
Now, McDonald's has decided to disclose ahead of the national law. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
On the other hand, however—and perhaps most importantly as a practical matter— McDonald’s reinforces that there is a high bar to a finding of Caremark liability. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:30 am by KATIE SCOTT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Scottish case, McDonald v Newton or McDonald, relates to Mr McDonald, who worked as a miner for British Coal between 11 Dec 1978 and 10 Aug 1985. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 8:44 am by legalinformatics
McDonald describes the obstacles preventing many people in developing countries from accessing legal services. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:19 pm
It ruled that there was little danger of confusion as the McDonald's served fast food whilst the appellant sold Indian food. [read post]
1 May 2009, 9:15 am
Further, the patrons of the Indian restaurant were adults whilst, accorduing to the court, McDonald's served mainly kids.It should be noted that Malaysia does not have dilution provisions which may have given McDonald's a remedy without the need to show confusion. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
To prove such use, McDonald’s submitted affidavits from McDonald’s representatives, brochures and printouts of advertising posters, printouts from McDonald’s websites, and a printout from Wikipedia. [read post]