Search for: "Melendez" Results 381 - 400 of 872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Dwight Sullivan
 (2)  Admissibility of drug testing reports Two argued CAAF cases may provide further guidance concerning the admissibility of drug testing reports in light of the Supreme Court’s Melendez-Diaz decision. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Washington and Melendez-Diaz, which records of testimonial statements require live testimony of the proponent of such statement to satisfy the defendant's Right of Confrontation. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:07 pm by Michael DelSignore
Additionally, the SJC's claim that the records the records memorialize routine scientific measurements is inconsistent with the language of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:32 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If the testing were to prove Anthony Melendez is innocent, he should be released from prison, Rice said. 'I’m sorry if they made a mistake,' he said. 'But I can’t go back. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:35 am
Supreme Court (SCOTUS, among the legal profession,) issued a landmark decision in the area of testimonial evidence in drug prosecutions, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Sweeney, which presents a Blazier/Melendez-Diaz type issue. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:27 am by Viking
One Track Bind: Brady, Melendez-Diaz, and Remedial Rationing Share This! [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:48 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Last week, I posted an entry about Cynthia Jones' A Reason to Doubt: The Suppression of Evidence and the Inference of Innocence, 100 J. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am by Dwight Sullivan
  Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:09 pm by Michael DelSignore
To read more about Melendez-Diaz and the right of confrontation, you can click on my prior blogs on this issue and refer to a Law Review Article from Creighton University, attached here. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The Melendez-Diaz cordoned off this rule on historical grounds, and I think that's fair enough. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:49 pm by Boston University Law Review
Joh Page 665 Delaware’s Non-Waivable Duties Lyman Johnson Page 701 ESSAY Judge Thompson and the Appellate Court Confirmation Process Carl Tobias Page 727 NOTES Legislating Around the Appointments Clause Matthew Hunter Page 753 Testing the Testimonial Doctrine: The Impact of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]response, the plaintiff failed to present evidence establishing either that she commenced the action within the applicable three-year limitations period, or that the continuous representation toll applied in this case, since all of the documentary evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the legal representation had ended more than three years before this action was commenced, and there was no mutual understanding of a need for ongoing legal representation in the underlying matter… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:19 pm by Viking
We also acknowledge thatMagyari was decided before Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:49 pm by seo
Those like my friend Juan Melendez, who after nearly eighteen years on death row in Florida was finally exonerated for the crime he did not commit. [read post]